🔗 Share this article

Out-of-pocket costs. Preferred providers. Out-of-network. Premium health services. Personal healthcare costs. Co-payment. Shared insurance. Benefit advisers. Coverage agents. Medical advisors. Affordable Care Act. HMO. Preferred Provider Organization. EPO. POS. HDHP. Health Savings Account. Flexible Spending Account. HRA. Explanation of Benefits. COBRA. Small Business Health Options Program. Single coverage. Family coverage. Premium tax credits.

Confused? It's understandable. Who comprehends all this stuff? Not the typical entrepreneur. Neither the average employee. Choosing the appropriate healthcare insurance for our business – or for our families – appears to require demands a PhD in healthcare.

The Healthcare System Is More Than Complicated, It Is Costly

Based on recent research, typical households pays $27,000 annually for their health insurance (up 6% from last year). Typical company healthcare expense is expected to surpass $seventeen thousand per employee in 2026, a 9.5% jump compared to 2025.

Currently federal operations is shut down because partisan disputes over tax credits which analysts predict will lead to a doubling of premiums for millions of Americans.

When Might We Seriously Consider Universal Healthcare?

When will we genuinely evaluate universal healthcare coverage in the United States? I have to believe we're getting closer because this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not suggesting government-run medicine. I'm proposing for our current Medicare system – an insurance system – simply expand to cover everyone. Our infrastructure doesn't change. The way medical professionals receive payment changes. Trust me, they will adjust.

How National Health Insurance Could Function

A national health insurance program would require contributions from workers and companies. In comparable systems, an employee earning average wages must contribute approximately five point three percent toward medical coverage. Their employer must contribute about 13.75%.

Does this seem expensive? Unless you compare that with what the typical American pays. I know multiple businesses who are easily contributing between 8% to 15% of payroll costs to their healthcare costs. And keep in mind that in inclusive programs, these contributions include pension plans, illness coverage, maternity leave and job loss protection along with funding healthcare facilities. When you add these expenses versus our current spending on retirement programs, job loss coverage and vacation benefits, the difference decreases.

Execution in the US

In the US, a national health premium would raise our Medicare tax deduction, a system already established. It ought to be means-based – those at higher income levels would pay more than those earning less. There would be both worker and company payments. Similar to much of federal defense, IT, social programs and transportation services, the system could be managed by private contractors instead of a government office.

Benefits for Small Businesses

Universal healthcare coverage represents a significant advantage for small businesses like mine. It would place small companies in equal competition with our larger competitors that can pay for superior coverage. It would render administration much easier (automatic payroll withholding processed similarly to social security and Medicare taxes, instead of individual transactions to benefit firms and coverage administrators).

It would enable simpler for us to budget our yearly costs, instead of enduring the complicated (and ineffective) process of bargaining with the big insurance providers required annually every year. Due to simplification, there would be improved comprehension about benefits among workers – as opposed to existing arrangements where they have to interpret the complexities of current options. Additionally there would certainly be less liability for companies as we no longer would be privy to workers' medical records for risk assessment and alternative plans.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as capitalist as possible. But I've learned that government play important functions in society, including national security to supporting essential systems. Ensuring medical coverage to all through a national insurance system strengthens our economy's infrastructure. It represents superior, simpler approach for small businesses that employ more than half of the country's workers and generate half of our GDP. It enables employees to be healthier, have better attendance and be more productive.

Addressing Concerns

Are there a million considerations I'm not addressing? Of course there are. Given rising medical expenses we've seen in recent years, it's clear that current healthcare legislation is not working effectively. And I realize that we're not a compact European nation where major reforms are easier to implement. But expanding universal Medicare, despite the additional taxes required, would still be a superior and more affordable approach for not only managing medical expenses and ensuring coverage to everyone.

Need for Honest Assessment

We as Americans, we need to reduce our own arrogance. America's medical care isn't exceptional. We rank significantly behind numerous nations with the best healthcare globally, according to major studies. Perhaps a bright spot amid present circumstances could be that we undertake a hard look at ourselves and acknowledge that major reforms are necessary.