🔗 Share this article

The tobacco company stands accused of “utter hypocrisy” for opposing anti-smoking regulations in Africa that currently exist in the UK.

Zambian lobbying efforts

Documents seen by journalists originating from the corporation's branch in Zambia to the African officials demands measures restricting tobacco marketing and promotional activities to be abandoned or delayed.

The corporation is pursuing modifications of a pending law that include lowering the suggested dimensions of visual health alerts on cigarette packaging, the removal of restrictions on scented cigarette varieties, and reduced sanctions for any businesses disregarding the new laws.

Activist commentary

“Were I in government, I would say that they allow the safeguarding of the British people and sustain the fatalities of the Zambian people,” commented Master Chimbala.

Thousands of residents a year succumb to smoking-associated diseases, according to global health agency statistics.

The campaigner stated the letter was known to have been circulated to multiple official agencies and was in circulating through public interest organizations.

Global industry interference concerns

The situation emerges alongside broader worries about business sector influence with health policies. Recently, WHO officials sounded an alarm that the cigarette manufacturers was intensifying efforts to undermine international regulations.

“There is proof of industry lobbying everywhere. Corporate signatures are on postponed duty hikes in Indonesia, stalled legislation in Zambia and even a weakened declaration at the UN international gathering,” commented the tobacco industry watchdog.

Possible outcomes

“If a tobacco control measure doesn't get enacted because of this letter, the price could be paid in lives of people who might otherwise quit smoking.”

The public health measure being considered by Zambia’s parliament includes measures that exceed UK legislation by including provisions for e-cigarettes, and mandating that graphic health warnings cover three-quarters of product packaging.

Corporate counter-proposals

Through correspondence, the company recommends this be lowered to thirty to fifty percent “following international recommended threshold”, delayed for at least one year after the law is enacted.

The WHO specifically advises a caution must occupy at least half of the cigarette package face “and attempt to encompass as much of the main visible surfaces as possible”. In the UK, warnings must cover nearly two-thirds of a product container sides.

Flavor restrictions debate

The company seeks the removal of broad restrictions on flavoured tobacco products, suggesting that it would push consumers toward “illegally traded” products. It suggests banning a limited selection of “scents derived from desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Each flavored smoking item have been prohibited in Britain since 2020.

The draft bill recommends punishments for various offences “varying from a percentage of annual turnover to ten-year jail sentences”.

Business explanation

In the letter, the managing director of the Zambian branch says the company is dedicated to ethical business practices” and “supports the objectives of governments to lower tobacco use and the associated health impact” but maintains that “specific rules can have negative and unanticipated results.”

Campaigner rebuttal

The campaigner argued the company's suggested modifications would “undermine this law so much that the impact needed for it to produce permanent improvement in society will not be achieved”.

The circumstance that multiple comparable regulations existed in the UK, where the company maintains its main office, was “complete contradiction”, he said.

“We exist in a international community. When I cultivate smoking products in my back yard and gather the crop and distribute the goods – and my children do not consume tobacco, but my community's youth consumes … to profit individually and all the future family lines while my neighbor's family are succumbing … is in itself complete moral collapse.”

Anti-smoking regulations in the UK or elsewhere had not caused companies to close, Chimbala said. “Legislation never shuts down the industry. They merely safeguard the people.”

Formal company response

The company representative said: “The company operates its activities following with current country statutes. Moreover, the company participates in the state's regulatory development in line with the relevant frameworks which enable interested party involvement in legislation creation.”

The corporation remained “not against rules”, they said, adding that young individuals should be protected from acquiring smoking products and nicotine.

“We advocate for progressive regulation to realize planned public health goals, while accepting the variety of rights and obligations on corporations, customers and associated groups,” they said, adding that BAT’s proposals “reflect the realities of the local commercial environment and tobacco industry, which involves growing volumes of illegal commerce”.

Zambia’s department of economic activities and commercial operations was solicited for statement.